<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BlogNetBiz.com &#187; Econ &#187; Adam Smith's Lost Legacy</title>
	<link>http://blognetbiz.com/econ/</link>
	<description>BlogNetBiz.com &#187; Econ &#187; Adam Smith's Lost Legacy</description>
	<generator>Gregarius 0.5.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Unavoidably Absent until Wednesday Evening</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/unavoidably-absent-until-wednesday.html</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 02:19:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/unavoidably-absent-until-wednesday.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	I may not blog at all from today until late Wednesday evening (GMT) due to a stay in hospital for an examination procedure.<br /><br />Apologies, but when the medics get hold of you, there is no choice!<br /><br />I'll get an insight into the National Health Service, which from some <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/unavoidably-absent-until-wednesday.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Was Galbraith a Good Historian?</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/was-galbraith-good-historian.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:57:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/was-galbraith-good-historian.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	History News Network <a href="http://hnn.us/articles/44469.html">here</a> Carol V. Hamilton asks: ‘Is David Brooks a Good Historian?’ (11 November):<br /><br />“In his New York Times columns, David Brooks often makes confident, if glancing, references to American and European history and historical figures. Too often these allusions are problematic, closer to received ideas <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/was-galbraith-good-historian.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Did the Elizabethan Guilds Promote General Opulence?</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/did-elizabethan-guilds-promote-general.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:09:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/did-elizabethan-guilds-promote-general.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	In a Blog, ‘stealth badger’, I find a most literate account of the role of organised labour from the ‘Black death’ in Europe to the writer’s strike in Hollywood films and tv (<a href="http://www.stealthbadger.net/log/index.php/2007/11/11/in-support-of-the-writers-guild-strike/">here</a>). <br /><br />Its author (unnamed) does a fairly convincing job on the emergence of labour from <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/did-elizabethan-guilds-promote-general.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Silly Sunday Story on Adam Smith no 5</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/silly-sunday-story-on-adam-smith-no-5.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 12:03:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/silly-sunday-story-on-adam-smith-no-5.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Responsible Nanotechnology <a href="http://crnano.typepad.com/crnblog/2007/11/they-just-emerg.html">here</a> offers a quotation by William Gibson on the invisible hand:<br /><br />“They Just Emerge"<br /><br />"Not Necessarily Relevant Quote of the Week:<br /><br />We don't legislate emergent technologies into existence. We almost never do. They just emerge, dragged forth by Adam Smith's invisible hand. Then we <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/silly-sunday-story-on-adam-smith-no-5.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: 'Invisible Handcuffs'?</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/invisible-handcuffs.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 11:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/invisible-handcuffs.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Michael Perelman teaches at California State University, Chico, and is an active writer from a broadly left-of-centre viewpoint. He is the author of about a dozen books on economics, both theory and policy.<br /><br />I met him at George Mason University this year, catching a paper he delivered to the <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/invisible-handcuffs.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Invisible Hand, no 371</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/invisible-hand-no-371.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 08:50:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/invisible-hand-no-371.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	K. Hansen writes in Living in interesting times (‘the fight to ensure access to higher education in New Brunswick’) <a href="http://livingininterestingtimes.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/hogs-at-the-trough-or-pigs-in-space/ ">here</a>. “Hogs at the Trough, or Pigs in Space”<br /><br />‘But now that we live in an age where, largely, industries are founded by financiers looking to make a <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/invisible-hand-no-371.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Invisible Hand no 370</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/invisible-hand-no-370.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 08:35:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/invisible-hand-no-370.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	In a Blog, entitled: “-Fighting Liberalism One Post At A Time... a blog by butch morgan” (<a href="http://123beta.blogspot.com/2007/11/murtha-must-go.html">here</a>) I find:<br /><br />'Trower' is a Republican running against John Murtha in Pennsylvania's 12th congressional district. From his site: ‘I am a Conservative. … I believe prosperity is best ensured by what <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/invisible-hand-no-370.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: British Tories Seize the Initiative on Adam Smith's Social Policies</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/british-tories-seize-initiative-on-adam.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:47:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/british-tories-seize-initiative-on-adam.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	“Cameron vows to reclaim core Tory values from Left<br />Back to Central Government” (<a href="http://www.24dash.com/centralgovernment/29119.htm">here</a>) <br />and also on Conservative Home(<a href="http://conservativehome.blogs.com/torydiary/2007/11/cameron-takes-t.html">here</a>) <br />“Cameron takes Tory message of social justice to Labour heartlands”<br /><br />"The co-op movement has generally been associated with the political left," he will say.<br /><br />"I <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/british-tories-seize-initiative-on-adam.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Adam Smith's Tone was Not Indifferent to the Effects on Labourers While they Adjusted to New Trading Arrangements</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/adam-smiths-tone-was-not-indifferent-to.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:30:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/adam-smiths-tone-was-not-indifferent-to.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Sally James in a publication from the Cato Institute writes: “Trade Adjustment Assistance no longer serving any purpose - Study advocates ending a flawed welfare program”<br /><br />The expiration of the current Trade Adjustment Assistance program at the end of this year is an ideal opportunity to sunset a misguided <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/adam-smiths-tone-was-not-indifferent-to.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Adam Smith's Support for Progressive Taxation</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/adam-smiths-support-for-progressive.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:52:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/adam-smiths-support-for-progressive.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Marc Lee writes in The Progressive Economics Forum (<a href="http://www.progressive-economics.ca/2007/11/08/adam-smith-and-progressive-taxation/">here</a>) on progressive taxation and quotes Adam Smith’s Wealth Of Nations:<br /><br />“Some of the knee-jerk commentary in response to my paper has been about what an ideal, or fair, tax system should really look like. These people question progressive taxation. <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/adam-smiths-support-for-progressive.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: A Californian Resident and Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/californian-resident-and-adam-smith.html</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:44:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/californian-resident-and-adam-smith.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Bill Falzett writing in the American Chronicle (5 November) on 'Madness 101: Blaming the Victim II – Causes of Poverty” (<a href="(http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=42270">here</a>) asserts:<br /><br />“Adam Smith, the economist who is often cited to justify free market economics, said that self interest was best served by human sympathy. He equated moral <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/californian-resident-and-adam-smith.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: A Beverleyhills Resident On Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/beverleyhills-resident-on-adam-smith.html</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:21:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/beverleyhills-resident-on-adam-smith.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Bill Falzett writing in the American Chronicle (5 November) on 'Madness 101: Blaming the Victim II – Causes of Poverty” (<a href="(http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=42270">here</a>) asserts:<br /><br />“Adam Smith, the economist who is often cited to justify free market economics, said that self interest was best served by human sympathy. He equated moral <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/beverleyhills-resident-on-adam-smith.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Invisible Hand no 369</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/invisible-hand-no-369_05.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:16:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/invisible-hand-no-369_05.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Peter Robb, The Ottawa Citizen, writes “Taking care of ourselves -- and each other”, 5 November, here:<br /><br />“One of the great pleasures of being an editorial writer is participating in editorial board meetings, where we meet with newsmakers, intellectuals and other interesting people or groups. The topics are varied <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/invisible-hand-no-369_05.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Why China Did Not Industrialise First?</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/why-china-did-not-industrialise-first.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 14:41:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/why-china-did-not-industrialise-first.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Greg Clark (and others) ask why the ‘industrial revolution’ as it is known, did not happen elsewhere first rather than in Britain. Among the countries mentioned as candidates for an IR is China. <br /><br />In The Bayesian Heresy (3 November)(<a href="http://bayesianheresy.blogspot.com/2007/11/lever-of-riches.html">here</a>)<br /><br />There is an interview with Joel Mokyr <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/why-china-did-not-industrialise-first.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Adam Smith On A Moral Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/adam-smith-on-moral-dilemma.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:03:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/adam-smith-on-moral-dilemma.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Jason Wong publishes an essay, ‘Of Sympathy, Justice, and Self Interest’ (<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/461715/Adam-Smith-of-Sympathy-Justice-and-SelfInterest">here</a>), which analyses a modern moral dilemma to test Adam Smith’s views in Moral Sentiments(1759). <br /><br />The moral dilemma Jason discusses arose from the discovery by two shepherds in Afghanistan of a Seal patrol searching to apprehend <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/adam-smith-on-moral-dilemma.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Property Rights Do Matter for Development</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/property-rights-do-matter-for.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 11:17:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/property-rights-do-matter-for.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Abdullah A. Dewan, Professor of Economics at Eastern Michigan University writes in The Daily Star (‘committed to people’s right to know’) Dhaka, Bangladesh (4 November) <a href="http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=10111">here</a>:<br /> <br />“The question "why do some countries prosper while others lag behind?" has animated the research interest of economists since Adam Smith. <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/property-rights-do-matter-for.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Beyond Comment!</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/beyond-comment.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:24:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/beyond-comment.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Sonia Arrison writing in the online newsletter, TechNewsWorld (‘all tech, all the time’) <a href="http://www.technewsworld.com/story/Thank-Boomers-for-Buffing-Up-Brain-Market-60109.html">here</a>:<br /><br />"Thank Boomers for Buffing Up Brain Market"<br /><br />“The next time someone complains about the baby boomers' obsession with youth, a good response would be to evoke Adam Smith. Remind them that self-interest in <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/beyond-comment.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Slowly and Gradually the Poor World Develops</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/slowly-and-gradually-poor-world.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/slowly-and-gradually-poor-world.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	John B. Chilton writes (31 October)in The Emirates Economist Blog (economic analysis of events in the United Arab Emirates and the Gulf) (<a href="http://http://emirateseconomist.blogspot.com/2007/10/in-praise-of-sweatshops-oldie-but-html">here</a>):<br /><br />“In praise of sweatshops: Oldie but goodie”, quoting Paul Krugman, New York Times:<br /><br />“On the opponents of globalization: <br /><br />When the movement gets <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/slowly-and-gradually-poor-world.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: A Remark on Adam Smith and Specialisation</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/remark-on-adam-smith-and-specialisation.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 05:35:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/remark-on-adam-smith-and-specialisation.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Chris Meisenzahl posts on The Amateur Economist and Curmudgeon Blog, 1 November, (<a href="http://amateureconblog.blogspot.com/2007/11/homeschooling-and-economics.html">here</a>):<br /><br />“Homeschooling and Economics” and makes a passing remark to Adam Smith (via the estimable) Dr. Boudreaux who “provides an excellent analysis here. We've learned that specialization is very beneficial (as he says, going all the <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/remark-on-adam-smith-and-specialisation.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Myth of the Invisisble Hand, no 368</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/myth-of-invisisble-hand-no-368.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:53:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/myth-of-invisisble-hand-no-368.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Ralph Thurm writes a Blog, ‘Sustainability Reporting Central’ and carries a post: ‘Recalibrating the Invisible Hand’, 1 November, (<a href="http://globalreporting.blogspot.com/2007/11/bback-to-basics-7-recalibrating.html">here</a>) which manages to be half-right on some things, correct on a few others, and woefully wrong on his main theme.<br /><br />“The critics of the concept of sustainable development and <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/myth-of-invisisble-hand-no-368.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Adam Smith Manuscript Arrives for Author's Editing</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/adam-smith-manuscript-arrives-for.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:02:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/adam-smith-manuscript-arrives-for.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Apologies for an absence since Sunday. <br /><br />Two factors intervened: one, I have received the editor's copy of the manuscript in the 'Great Thinkers' series for Palgrave and have been responding on my online version, plus editing to reduce the wordage; hopefully, by repetitions, and sloppy sentences and not <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/11/adam-smith-manuscript-arrives-for.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Mark Hodak Sumarises Our Differences as Differences of Emphasis</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/mark-hodak-sumarises-our-differences-as.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:31:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/mark-hodak-sumarises-our-differences-as.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	In comments to my previous post Mark Hodak posts his considered reply, which summarises neatly where we differ and why. I think this should be the last word as I do not think we can do other than disagree over what to emphasise, rather than contest issues of great principle.<br <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/mark-hodak-sumarises-our-differences-as.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: The Debate Continues (long post!)</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/debate-continues-long-post.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 08:52:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/debate-continues-long-post.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Mark writes:<br /> <br />"The basic difference rested on whether joint-stock companies or any companies in fact, co-partnerys or regulated, were made monopolies or not. This seems to be lost on you."<br /><br />How, then, do you read this statement:<br /><br />"It is upon this account that joint-stock companies for <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/debate-continues-long-post.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: "Mark Hodak on Adam Smith": a debate begins</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/mark-hodaks-on-adam-smith-debate-begins.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:03:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/mark-hodaks-on-adam-smith-debate-begins.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	In case you did not read the 'comments' to yesterday's article Mark Hodak replied to my post, as below, and I replied to Mark's comments (also below).<br /><br />Mark Hodak writes:<br /> <br />"Gavin,<br /><br />I don't think that the article you're critiquing is the one I wrote. I don't <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/mark-hodaks-on-adam-smith-debate-begins.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Mark Hodak's Fantasy Folly About Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/mark-hodaks-fantasy-folly-about-adam.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:10:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/mark-hodaks-fantasy-folly-about-adam.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Marc Hodak writes in Forbes (25 Octover), “Adam Smith's Folly”(25 Oct) <br />Mark Hodak <a href="http://www.forbes.com/markets/2007/10/24/adam-smith-corporations-markets-marketsp07-cx_mh_1025hodak.html">asserts</a>:<br /><br />“Were Adam Smith alive today, he'd be an activist hedge fund manager or a private equity raider. He had a decidedly pessimistic view about corporations. Most businesses of his day were proprietorships or <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/mark-hodaks-fantasy-folly-about-adam.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: If Only Modern Economists Would Read and Understand His Thinking</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/if-only-modern-economists-would-read.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:42:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/if-only-modern-economists-would-read.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	On International Law Reporter (<a href="http://ilreports.blogspot.com/2007/10/petersmann-constitutionalism-and.html ">here</a>) <br />Jacob Katz Cogan writes: “Petersmann: Constitutionalism and the Regulation of International Markets”, which contains this paragraph:<br /><br />“Since Adam Smith, economists increasingly acknowledge these interdependencies between economic, legal and social order, for example between the economic objective of promoting consumer welfare through <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/if-only-modern-economists-would-read.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: A Neat Tutoring Aid on the Evolution of Commerce</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/neat-tutoring-aid-on-evolution-of.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:22:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/neat-tutoring-aid-on-evolution-of.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	On Diverse Thoughts (<a href="http://rogercostello.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/mankinds-journey-from-hunter-gatherers-to-coins-as-the-instrument-for-doing-commerce/">here</a>) the author, Roger Costello, has drawn a most interesting flow diagram of “Mankind’s journey from hunter-gatherers to coins as the instrument for doing commerce”, based he says on Adam Smith’s Wealth Of Nations and Jared Diamond’s Guns, Germs, and Steel.<br /><br />I could quibble about <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/neat-tutoring-aid-on-evolution-of.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Abortion Debates and Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/abortion-debates-and-adam-smith.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:34:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/abortion-debates-and-adam-smith.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	‘Gracchi’ on Westminsters Wisdom (25 Oct): ‘The Argument About Abortion’ <a href="http://gracchii.blogspot.com/2007/10/argument-about-abortion.html">here</a>: <br /><br />“Looking at the abortion debate, the most interesting thing about it is that it denotes I think the basis for most modern moral judgements. The basis for most people's morality it seems to me from this <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/abortion-debates-and-adam-smith.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Context is Important When Quoting Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/context-is-important-when-quoting-adam.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:27:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/context-is-important-when-quoting-adam.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Robert Reich’s <a href="http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2007/10/who-pays-dollars-that-finance-bushs-war.html">Blog</a> carries this post (24 October):<br /><br />"Who Pays the Dollars that Finance Bush's War? More on a Fair Tax Burden”<br /><br />In his discussion of war finance he states (legitimately):<br /><br />“If we’re serious about national defense – as well as all the other things we <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/context-is-important-when-quoting-adam.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: A Person Moans in a Country that at Least 5 Billion Others Would Gladly Swap Places With For His Misery</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/person-moans-in-coutnry-that-at-least-5.html</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/person-moans-in-coutnry-that-at-least-5.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	In what is becoming a typical rant of despair among us, Alfred Sant writes in the Times of Malta.com (24 Oct) <a href="http://www.timesofmalta.com/core/article.php?id=5402">here</a>: “Praying mantis”:<br /><br />“The dominant ideology... which will be with us for a long time: indeed, till we all are dead... is defined by free market mechanisms. <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/person-moans-in-coutnry-that-at-least-5.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Adam Smith on Necessities and Luxuries (the latter may be taxed)</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/adam-smith-on-necessities-and-luxuries.html</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:49:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/adam-smith-on-necessities-and-luxuries.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	The Bayesian Heresy ('economics, global agenda, current affairs, globalisation, culture and more rants on the dismal science') <a href="http://bayesianheresy.blogspot.com/2007/10/quote-of-day_22.html">here</a>:<br /><br />“Quote of the Day- Adam Smith in 21st Century” by Marshall Jevons.<br /><br />“Under necessaries, therefore, I comprehend[,] not only those things which nature, but those things which the established <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/adam-smith-on-necessities-and-luxuries.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: When Quoting Someone's Views Make Sure You Have Read the Original (all historians should know that!)</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/when-quoting-someones-views-make-sure.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:52:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/when-quoting-someones-views-make-sure.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Following my new policy of noting when other economics blogs note Lost Legacy, Brad Delong today reports:<br /><br />“A Gathering of the Clans...<br />Economic historians, historians of economic thought, practitioners of political economy, and others are painting themselves blue with woad and practicing with staves after reading Stanford's David Kennedy's <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/when-quoting-someones-views-make-sure.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Absolute Nonsense on 'Digg' About Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/absolute-nonsense-on-digg-about-adam.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:14:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/absolute-nonsense-on-digg-about-adam.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	On a blog called ‘Digg’ (<a href="http://digg.com/general_sciences/The_Economics_Nobel_Giving_Adam_Smith_a_Helping_Hand">here</a>) I found this in my in-box:<br /><br />“The Economics Nobel: Giving Adam Smith a Helping Hand”<br /><br />"Scottish philosopher Adam Smith asserted that when everyone acts out of self-interest, everyone will eventually benefit, as if a benevolent "invisible hand" molds the economy. Economists <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/absolute-nonsense-on-digg-about-adam.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: An Excellent Post by David Warsh on Economic Principals</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/excellent-post-by-david-warsh-on.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:22:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/excellent-post-by-david-warsh-on.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	David Warsh, who writes the Blog, Economic Principals, has featured on Lost Legacy, usually in the critical section, in mild disputes over Adam Smith. This difference between us is not serious nor personal (and having met David Warsh and heard him lecture, he personifies the American gentleman) and if you <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/excellent-post-by-david-warsh-on.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Is David Kennedy 'the Stupidist Man Alive'?</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/is-david-kennedy-stupidist-man-alive.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 06:14:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/is-david-kennedy-stupidist-man-alive.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	There are several comments on economics Blogs on the review of Paul Krugman’s book, ‘The Conscience of a Liberal’ (W. W. Norton, October 2007, $25.95 or $15.57 from Amazon), by David Kennedy (positively no relation!), who is the Donald J. McLachlan Professor of History at Stanford University.<br /><br />Brad Delong, <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/is-david-kennedy-stupidist-man-alive.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Capitalist Competition is Better for the Environment than State Managed Poverty</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/capitalist-competition-is-better-for.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:47:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/capitalist-competition-is-better-for.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Prometheus 6's blog (all respect and no restraint):<br />Under the title, ‘The damn book pile is too high already...’, ‘Prometheus 6's blog (all respect and no restraint)’, quotes an excerpt (<a href="http://www.prometheus6.org/node/18361">here</a>) from a New York Times review of Robert B. Reich’s ‘Supercapitalism: The transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/capitalist-competition-is-better-for.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Lost Legacy Cited on Inheritance Tax</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/lost-legacy-cited-on-inheritance-tax.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:14:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/lost-legacy-cited-on-inheritance-tax.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Occasionally, other Blogs cite Lost Legacy posts and I am always happy for them to do so, especially when it is from 'friendly' sources, such as today's ASI, though I have no objection to 'hostile' Blogs, of course.<br /><br />The Adam Smith Institute (London) operates one of the larger economics <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/lost-legacy-cited-on-inheritance-tax.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: 'Benvolent' Invisible Hands Are a Neoclassical Invention not Adam Smith's Naivety</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/benvolent-invisible-hands-are.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 04:58:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/benvolent-invisible-hands-are.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Adrian Cho in ScienceNOW Daily News (15 October) writes, ‘The Economics Nobel: Giving Adam Smith a Helping Hand’,(<a href="http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2007/1015/1">here</a>): <br /><br />“Scottish philosopher Adam Smith asserted that when everyone acts out of self-interest, everyone will eventually benefit, as if a benevolent "invisible hand" molds the economy. Economists now know that <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/benvolent-invisible-hands-are.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Disengenuous Defence of Inheritance Tax by a 'Non Dom'</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/disengenuous-defence-of-inheritance-tax.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:39:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/disengenuous-defence-of-inheritance-tax.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Irwin Stelzer, a director of economic policy studies at the Hudson Institute and a columnist for the Sunday Times and The Spectator writes:<br /><br />“Listen to Adam Smith: inheritance tax is good” (Spectator, 17 October):<br /><br />“To meet the criteria of ‘evident justice and utility’, Adam Smith supported a tax <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/disengenuous-defence-of-inheritance-tax.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: A Rare Mention of Adam Smith That is Accurate</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/rare-mention-of-adam-smith-that-is.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:07:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/rare-mention-of-adam-smith-that-is.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Michael Miller writes for the Acton Institute (<a href="http://www.acton.org/commentary/commentary408.php">here</a>): ‘Who’s Afraid of Free Trade?’ and includes the following:<br /><br />“Few things are better for economic growth than free trade. Adam Smith demonstrated the mutual benefit of trade with his famous example of the brewer, butcher, and baker. The butcher has <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/rare-mention-of-adam-smith-that-is.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: The Authentic Adam Smith at the Tuesday Club</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/authentic-adam-smith-at-tueaday-club.html</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:52:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/authentic-adam-smith-at-tueaday-club.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Last evening I attended a monthly dinner club meeting of the appropriately named ‘Tuesday Club’, the format of which was as ‘speaker’, I spoke for 20 minutes on what was billed by the chairman, Michael Fryer, an historian of credible reputation, as ‘Adam Smith in the 21st Century’. <br /><br <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/authentic-adam-smith-at-tueaday-club.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Maynard Keynes Would Have Benefited from Reading Adam Smith Instead of Repeating Distortions of His Legacy</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/maynard-keynes-would-have-benefited.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 07:46:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/maynard-keynes-would-have-benefited.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	I reported yesterday that I had read the first three chapters of Paul Davidson’s ‘John Maynard Keynes’ ( Palgrave, 2007: Great Thinkers in Economics; series editor, Tony Thirlwall). I turned to Chapter 4 shortly afterwards and was confronted with assertions by Paul Davidson which I found disappointing. (True, he has <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/maynard-keynes-would-have-benefited.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Confusion in a Church</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/confusion-in-church.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/confusion-in-church.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	“Self-sacrifice, not self-interest, vital to stewardship”<br />By Rt Rev. Duncan M. Gray III, writes in the Jackson Clarion Ledger (<a href="http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071013/FEAT04/710130313/1022/feat04 ">here</a>): <br /><br />“However, the guiding principle in the efficiency and efficacy of our culture's way of doing things is the "invisible hand" of Adam Smith's capitalism and not <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/confusion-in-church.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: New Book on Keynes Pleases Me, But Won't Please Everybody</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/new-book-on-keynes-pleases-me-but-wont.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:33:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/new-book-on-keynes-pleases-me-but-wont.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	The first of 17 volumes for the Great Thinkers in Economics series, edited by A. P. Thirwall, has been published by Palgrave Macmillan. It is by Paul Davidson and is titled simply: John Maynard Keynes.<br /><br />I have read the first three chapters and it promises to be a controversial <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/new-book-on-keynes-pleases-me-but-wont.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: My 'Nobel Prize' Suggestion</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/my-nobel-prize-suggestion.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 03:12:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/my-nobel-prize-suggestion.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel will be announced on Monday.<br /><br />There’s much angst among the Blogs with the usual suspects predicted to be in the running. <br /><br />Greg Mankiw, a leading Blogger, Harvard Professor, author of one of (if not the <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/my-nobel-prize-suggestion.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Now We Have an 'Invisible Fist' as a 'Buddy'!</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/now-we-have-invisible-fist-as-buddy.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:06:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/now-we-have-invisible-fist-as-buddy.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Angry Economist (<a href="http://angry-economist.russnelson.com/2007/10/11#the-invisible-fist-of-the-market">here</a>) <br />presents a paragraph for what I hope is purely for rhetorical effect and not because he believes in invisible body parts, much as ancient savages and educated religious people believed in invisible gods:<br /> <br />“The Invisible Fist of the Market”<br /><br />“Free markets avoid <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/now-we-have-invisible-fist-as-buddy.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: David Kelly's "Heresy" Spreads; Adam Smith 'Libelled'</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/david-kellys-heresy-spreads-adam-smith.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:22:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/david-kellys-heresy-spreads-adam-smith.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Doug Mataconis posts on the The Liberty Papers Blog (<a href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/10/11/the-heroes-of-capitalism/">here</a>) reproduces ‘The Heroes Of Capitalism’ by David Kelly (described as a ‘philosopher’, which might explain his elementary confusion of Bernard Mandeville (1724) with Adam Smith):<br /><br />‘In an article that appeared in yesterday’s Wall Street Journal, but only became <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/david-kellys-heresy-spreads-adam-smith.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: A Post That Presents Adam Smith as he Intended</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/post-that-presents-adam-smith-as-he.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/post-that-presents-adam-smith-as-he.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	David Hoopes addressing Smith’s wider views on markets versus state management of economic decisions, presents a 99.9 per cent correct version of them (the other 0.1 per cent slight blemish is his mention, en passant, of the ubiquitous ‘invisible hand’, but let’s ignore that slightest of slips on grounds that <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/post-that-presents-adam-smith-as-he.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: A Classic Example of the Re-writing of Adam Smith's Legacy</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/classic-example-of-re-writing-of-adam.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/classic-example-of-re-writing-of-adam.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Henry C. K. Liu, Chairman of a New York-based private investment group, writes (12 October) in Asia Times online, Kowloon Hong Kong, an interesting article: “Super Capitalism, Super Imperialism”, Part 1: ‘A Structural Link’ (<a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/IJ12Dj01.html">here</a>) and the following caught my eye:<br /> <br />“Adam Smith published Wealth of Nations <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/classic-example-of-re-writing-of-adam.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Adam Smith Ideas Are Not Represented in 'Atlas Shrugged'</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/adam-smith-ideas-are-not-represented-in.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/adam-smith-ideas-are-not-represented-in.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Following yesterday's plea for help in locating the full text of the WSJ article, 'Capitalist Heroes' which contained the sentence below, I have received a full text from a reader (for which many thanks).<br /><br />The article was written by Mr. David Kelley, author of "A Life of One's Own: <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/adam-smith-ideas-are-not-represented-in.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Call for Help</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/call-for-help.html</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:07:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/call-for-help.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Anybody help me read this article in the WSJ?<br /><br />A tantalising extract from an article in today's Wall Street Journal is blocked by subscription and I wonder if any reader has access to it who can send it to me?<br /><br />"Capitalist Heroes<br />Wall Street Journal - USA<br />... <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/call-for-help.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: New Book on 19th Century Mercantile Protection</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/new-book-on-19th-century-mercantile.html</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:07:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/new-book-on-19th-century-mercantile.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Nick Gillespie write ‘French Wine and the Fable of Free-Trade Britain', a review and interview with John V. C. Nye, author of War, Wine, and Taxes: The Political Economy of Anglo-French Trade, 1689-1900, in the reasononline blog.<br /><br />‘John V.C. Nye debunks the conventional wisdom that Britain was a free-trade <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/new-book-on-19th-century-mercantile.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: A Conservative Reviews Gregory Clark's 'AFTA'</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/conservative-reviews-gregory-clarks.html</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 05:19:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/conservative-reviews-gregory-clarks.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Steve Sailer reviews Gregory Clark’s ‘A Farewell to Alms’ on VDARE.com (<a href="http://www.vdare.com/sailer/071008_farewell.htm">here</a>) 8 October:<br /><br />‘A Farewell To Alms: Why Did The Industrial Revolution Happen Where It Did?’<br /><br />‘In the process, Clark offers a stunning rebuke to economists:<br /><br />"God clearly created the laws of the economic world <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/conservative-reviews-gregory-clarks.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Kirk Hamilton's Perspective on Institutions is Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/kirk-hamiltons-perspective-on.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:57:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/kirk-hamiltons-perspective-on.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	The debate on what caused growth and from growth the wealth of nations deepens. In addition to reading Gregory Clark’s ‘A Farewell to Alms’ (Princeton University Press), ‘Angry Bear’ (‘slightly left of center economic commentary on news, politics, and the economy’ Blog) <a href="http://angrybear.blogspot.com/2007/10/human-capital-is-where-its-at.html">here </a> 8 October carries and important <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/kirk-hamiltons-perspective-on.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: John Nash Did not Invert Adam Smith on Bargaining</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/john-nash-did-not-invert-adam-smith-on.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/john-nash-did-not-invert-adam-smith-on.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Much confusion about Adam Smith’s analysis of bargaining relations originates in the neoclassical paradigm and has spread into media discourse by default. For example, ‘persondem’ writes: ‘Beautiful Minds Needed to Reach Across the Divide’ in BlueNC Blog (‘the people’s think tank’)(7 October) <a href="http://bluenc.com/beautiful-minds-needed-to-reach-across-the-divide">here</a>:<br /><br />“Adam Smith posited that self-interest <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/john-nash-did-not-invert-adam-smith-on.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Are Lists Worth the The Ego That Feeds Them?</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/are-lists-worth-the-ego-that-feeds-them.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 13:45:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/are-lists-worth-the-ego-that-feeds-them.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	CurrencyTrading.Net is running a list: ‘Top 100 Academic Blogs Every Professional Investor Should Read’ compiled by Jessica Hupp (<a href="http://www.currencytrading.net/2007/top-100-academic-blogs-every-professional-investor-should-read/ ">here</a>)<br /> <br />Lost Legacy has been placed at: ‘67’ and is described as: ‘Adam Smith’s Lost Legacy: This blog discusses the legacy of Scottish political economist Adam Smith’.<br /><br <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/are-lists-worth-the-ego-that-feeds-them.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: En Route for Edinburgh</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/en-route-for-edinburgh.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 02:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/en-route-for-edinburgh.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	I am travelling back to Scotland from France today and I have had a busy time these last few days with the necessary social arrangements on departing the village, including visiting the mayor on local matters, neighbours in social matters, and peparing the house for the winter shutdown.<br /><br />Inevitably, <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/en-route-for-edinburgh.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Wikipedia Is Not a Good Source For Understanding the Invisible Hand</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/wikipedia-is-not-good-source-for.html</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/wikipedia-is-not-good-source-for.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	In what for me was a slightly nostalgic piece about IMB tracing developments after the short era of the IBM360 machines by Irving Wladawsky Berger: “Welcome to Adam Smith’s World” at Always On: the insider’s network (AOBlog) (<a href="http://alwayson.goingon.com/">here</a>). I read it with interest because I remember those years well <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/wikipedia-is-not-good-source-for.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Reuter's Chief, Tom Glocer on Alan Greenspan and Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/reuters-chief-tom-glocer-on-alan.html</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 05:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/reuters-chief-tom-glocer-on-alan.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	From Tom Glocer’s Blog (Chief Executive Officer of Reuters [BETA])<a href="http://tomglocer.com/blogs/sample_weblog/default.aspx">here</a>: “Alan Greenspan and Adam Smith”:<br /><br />“In a private chat after the event [opened by Prime Minister Gordon Brown], I had the chance to explore further with Dr. Greenspan the observation he made during his formal remarks that after <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/reuters-chief-tom-glocer-on-alan.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Chicago Glen Smith Confuses Chicago Adam Smith With the Kirkcaldy Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/chicago-glen-smith-confuses-chicago.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:45:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/chicago-glen-smith-confuses-chicago.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Glenn W. Smith: 'Could You Explain a Vote Against Children's Health to the Children?' (find it <a href="http://www.BuzzFlash.com">here</a>: (‘PROGRESSIVE BOOKS, MOVIES, AND MUSIC- FOR PROGRESSIVES, BY PROGRESSIVES, ON BUZZFLASH’) at BuzzFlash – Chicago), gives us this harmless nonsense:<br /><br />“Would you tell them that once upon a time there was <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/chicago-glen-smith-confuses-chicago.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Adam Smith's Central Role for Justice</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/adam-smiths-central-role-for-justice.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 10:35:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/adam-smiths-central-role-for-justice.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	In The Kenyon Review (1 Oct) by Tyler Meier (<a href="http://kenyonreview.org/blog">here</a>) there is an article, ‘On Intellectual Property and Copyright, Pt. II’, reporting ‘an exchange between Meg Galipault and Stuart Bernstein on intellectual property and copyright issues’, conducted during the summer months of 2007.<br /><br />It includes this statement by <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/adam-smiths-central-role-for-justice.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Gregory Clark Acknowledges that Adam Smith's Ideas May Not Be Represented by 'Modern' Economists</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/gregory-clark-acknowledges-that-adam.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 06:42:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/gregory-clark-acknowledges-that-adam.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	In all of the debate over Gregory Clark’s new book, A Farewell to Alms (Princeton University Press) – surely destined to become a major contributor to economic policy in the coming years – it is clear that the author is listening in an area of interest to Lost Legacy, namely <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/10/gregory-clark-acknowledges-that-adam.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Apologies to Stevie Joe, But He's Still Wrong About Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/apologies-to-stevie-joe-but-hes-still.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/apologies-to-stevie-joe-but-hes-still.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	A correspondent has taken me to task for what appears to be an apparent snub, or at least an act of discourtesy (unintentional I can assure all), in that I made a criticism of his views attributed to Adam Smith (2 July, Lost Legacy), to which he added a couple <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/apologies-to-stevie-joe-but-hes-still.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Impressive Interview with Gregory Clark: a comment</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/impressive-interview-with-gregory-clark.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 05:11:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/impressive-interview-with-gregory-clark.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Gregory Clark gives an interview (<a href="MyDD - http://www.mydd.com/section/Diary">here</a>) to the Intrepid Liberal Journal, 29 September, and explains the themes of his thesis from ‘A Farewell to Alms’ (Princeton University Press, 2007) in clear language for all. It is an impressive performance. I give a selected paragraph relating to Adam <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/impressive-interview-with-gregory-clark.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Bryan Caplan on Invisible Hands and Selfish Businessmen</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/bryan-caplan-on-invisible-hands-and.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:54:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/bryan-caplan-on-invisible-hands-and.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Bryan Caplan has a literate, pacy and thoughtful article on the Blog (October 2007): ReasonOnline (‘free minds and free markets’), which all readers should visit <a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/122019.htm">here</a>: <br />It’s called: “The Four Boneheaded Biases of Stupid Voters (and we’re all stupid voters)” and you will get a lot out of <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/bryan-caplan-on-invisible-hands-and.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: A Misleading Quotation Exposes the Ignorance of the Quoter</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/misleading-quotation-exposes-ignorance.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 05:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/misleading-quotation-exposes-ignorance.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Game of quotation swapping to show that Adam Smith was a) conservative, or b) a socialist, are relatively harmless. Some people even write entire books on the subject, or build propaganda careers out of it.<br /><br />So Shawn Fremstad writing in the Blog, Inclusion (‘independent progressive new’) today has a <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/misleading-quotation-exposes-ignorance.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/apologies-for-absence.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:55:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/apologies-for-absence.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	I HAVE BEEN LAID LOW WITH A HEAVY BOUT OF 'FLU OR SOMETHING LIKE IT PREVENTING ME FROM WRITING, LET ALONE READING.<br /><br />HOPEFULLY,I SHALL RETURN TO LOST LEGACY TOMORROW, FRIDAY.<br /><br />SEVERAL ITEMS FOR COMMENT ARE BACKED UP.<br /><br />APOLOGIES ALL ROUND<br /><br />GAVIN <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/apologies-for-absence.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: More Myths About Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/more-myths-about-adam-smith.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:21:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/more-myths-about-adam-smith.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Chandrabhan Prasad in the Daily Pioneer (New Delhi) writes:<br /><br />“The final quarter of the 18th century was the launching pad for the industrial revolution. That phase witnessed battles between handlooms and powerlooms. The triumph of machine was facilitated by many factors, crucial being the intellectual umbrella hoisted by Adam <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/more-myths-about-adam-smith.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Ancient Chinese Thinkers  On Liberty</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/ancient-chinese-thinkers-on-liberty.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:03:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/ancient-chinese-thinkers-on-liberty.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	From: The American Spectator "The Case for Market Taoism" by James A. Dorn, vice president for academic affairs at Cato Institute (24 September}:<br /><br />“Lao-tzu, thought to have been an older contemporary of Confucius, may have been the first libertarian. In the Tao Te Ching ("The Classic of the Way <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/ancient-chinese-thinkers-on-liberty.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Bryan Caplan Summarises his Critique of a Farewell to Alms</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/bryan-caplan-summarises-his-critique-of.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:04:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/bryan-caplan-summarises-his-critique-of.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Bryan Caplan, co-athor of the Blog: EconLog (‘issues and insights in economics’) writes a lucid summary of his critique of Gregory Clark’s ‘A Farewell to Alms’ (Princeton University Press). <br /><br />You should read his critique (<a href="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2007/09/a_farewell_to_a.html#comments">here</a>) <br /><br />I commented on EconLog and I append my comments (on <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/bryan-caplan-summarises-his-critique-of.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Why I Criticise Misattributions on the Invisible Hand</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/why-i-criticise-misattributions-on.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:58:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/why-i-criticise-misattributions-on.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Correspondents suggest occasionally (politely) that I should ease up on my critiques of the many references made to the ‘invisible hand’, on the grounds that it is: a) a hopeless quest given the widespread belief that it was Adam Smith’s ‘theory’, even if its wasn’t; b) it is not all <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/why-i-criticise-misattributions-on.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Belief in Invisible Hands Belittle Adam Smith's legacy</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/belief-in-invisible-hands-belittle-adam.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:34:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/belief-in-invisible-hands-belittle-adam.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Mary Kissel (editor of The Wall Street Journal Asia's editorial page) in Opinion Journal of the Wall Street Journal, writes a nice piece on a bustling market in New Delhi. It is worth reading, except for the usual attributions to Adam Smith:<br /><br />“Passage to India: Adam Smith in a <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/belief-in-invisible-hands-belittle-adam.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Greenspan is Not the Second Coming of Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/greenspan-is-not-second-coming-of-adam.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 04:40:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/greenspan-is-not-second-coming-of-adam.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	William Neikirk reviews Alan Greenspan's memior in the The Swamp (Tribune’s Washington Bureau)(21 September): 'Greenspan's memoir: Adam Smith rides again'.<br /><br />“Greenspan is the Adam Smith of our time. He believes in the "invisible hand" that guides free markets and leads to greater economic growth and wealth for those willing <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/greenspan-is-not-second-coming-of-adam.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Did Adam Smith 'Denounce' the Division Of Labour?</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/did-adam-smith-denounce-division-of.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 08:20:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/did-adam-smith-denounce-division-of.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	From Civilisation (fanatics centre), Civilisation IV: ‘Beyond the Sword’, a sort of gaming website with some interesting forums and occasional ‘off topic’ posting, (<a href="http://forums.civfanatics.com ">here</a>) I came across this contribution from ‘Princeps’:<br /><br />“While I've read some of Adam Smith's Wealth of nations, I haven't quite gotten to a <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/did-adam-smith-denounce-division-of.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Great News from Canberra for the History of Economics</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/great-news-from-canberra-for-history-of.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:10:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/great-news-from-canberra-for-history-of.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Recently, the Australian Bureau of Statistics initated a move to transfer Economic History and the History of Economic Thought from the classification of Economics into a miscellaneous groupong including philosophy and Religion.<br /><br />This was regarded by scholars in these fields as an appalling misjudgement on the part of ASB. <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/great-news-from-canberra-for-history-of.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Labour MP Quits Aussie Parliament Quoting Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/labour-mp-quits-aussie-parliament.html</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/labour-mp-quits-aussie-parliament.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	‘Valedictory’ speech by Carmen Lawrence MP, an occasional Webdiary columnist for much of Webdiary’s existence is published today in Webdiary (‘patron power’) an Australian Blog. It contains this paragraph:<br /><br />“The contemporary position of many governments, including this one, is that Adam Smith’s ‘invisible hand’ should be allowed almost unfettered <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/labour-mp-quits-aussie-parliament.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Can Government Funded 'Enterprise' Agencies do Better than Markets?</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/can-government-funded-enterprise.html</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 02:32:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/can-government-funded-enterprise.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	I came across a new Blog on the block a few days ago and I am recommending that you take a look at it over a week or so. It describes itself: “The Lockesmith Blog" which 'hopes to play an important role in the growing resurgence of the scholarship of <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/can-government-funded-enterprise.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: $10,000 For a Script Idea, but is it Good Idea?</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/10000-for-script-idea-but-is-it-good.html</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/10000-for-script-idea-but-is-it-good.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	From National Association of Manufacturers (‘We are the millions of people who makes things in America’) 18 September: Carter Wood sets a challenge: “Any Pro-Business College Bloggers Out There?”:<br /><br />America's Future Foundation, which supports development of young, free-market-minded leaders, is sponsoring a contest for the best college (graduate and <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/10000-for-script-idea-but-is-it-good.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Whichever Adam Smith Alan Greenspan Now Rejects It Wasn't the Adam Smith Born in Kirkcaldy in 1723</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/whichever-adam-smith-alan-greenspan-now.html</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:28:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/whichever-adam-smith-alan-greenspan-now.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	From Newsweek online, 17 September: “The economics of human behaviour: Alan Greenspan discovers that human beings are … irrational!” by Daniel Gross.<br /><br />‘The acolyte of Ayn Rand believed market capitalism was ordained to triumph in the 20th century because it spoke to human strivings in a way that collectivism <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/whichever-adam-smith-alan-greenspan-now.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: A Libertarian on Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/libertarian-on-adam-smith.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:15:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/libertarian-on-adam-smith.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	In the Blog: Colliding Softly (<a href="http://www.perbylund.com/blog">here</a>) there is an article “On the Art of Writing and Science” (the author is not identified), much of which I would probably be sympathetic to, except for these two paragraphs:<br /><br />“When Adam Smith wrote about the division of labor and how the <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/libertarian-on-adam-smith.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Somebody Called Karry Kudlow on Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/somebody-called-karry-kudlow-on-adam.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:42:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/somebody-called-karry-kudlow-on-adam.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	In the Nationalreviewonline, 17 September there is an article: 'how about Reagan and Thatcher' by Larry Kudlow <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/ ">here</a>:<br /> <br />"But the real hero of the last couple of decades is undoubtedly the triumph of free-market capitalism around the world. Krishna Guha of the Financial Times is the <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/somebody-called-karry-kudlow-on-adam.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Adam Smith Was Interested and knowlegable About China</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/adam-smith-was-interested-and.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:18:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/adam-smith-was-interested-and.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	In a PR sheet from (PR-GB) we get a piece on the Internet in China:<br />‘Internet is growing in China’ (written by EditorsChoice, 16 September)<br /><br />‘Adam Smith, the Scottish economist and philosopher from the 18th century, who wrote the ‘Wealth of Nations’ and is considered the father of capitalism, <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/adam-smith-was-interested-and.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: A Darwinian Conservative Joins the Debate on Gregory Clark's New Book</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/darwinian-conservative-joins-debate-on.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:25:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/darwinian-conservative-joins-debate-on.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Larry Arnhart (Darwinian Conservatism Blog) contributes a most interesting post to the debate over Gregory Clark’s ‘A Farewell to Alms’ (Princeton University Press), <a href="http://darwinianconservatism.blogspot.com/2007/09/gregory-clarks-farewell-to-alms.html">here</a>.<br /><br />“My interest in the book comes from its Darwinian theory of the Industrial Revolution. <br /><br />"Explaining why the Industrial Revolution emerged first in <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/darwinian-conservative-joins-debate-on.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Don't Mention Utopia!</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/dont-mention-utopia.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 04:43:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/dont-mention-utopia.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Ulrich Beck, professor of sociology at Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich and at London School of Economics and Political Science, writes in the Shanghai Daily.com 14 September: <br /><br />‘Nation States change in a cosmopolitan world’:<br /><br />“In the intellectual movement of the Scottish enlightenment during the late 18 century, <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/dont-mention-utopia.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Why Did the Industrial ‘Revolution’ Occur in Britain?: a contribution to a debate at Marginal Revolution</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/why-did-industrial-revolution-occur-in.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 04:34:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/why-did-industrial-revolution-occur-in.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	For the debate see Marginal Revolution Blog<br /><br />“In one part of the UK, Scotland, the events around the tail-end of Scotland being an independent country from the ‘Glorious Revolution’ of 1688 did have a profound effect, directly related to the catholic-protestant divide (and the divide within the protestant church). <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/why-did-industrial-revolution-occur-in.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Conclusions on Gregory Clark's 'Farewell to Alms'</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/conclusions-on-gregory-clarks-farewell.html</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:25:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/conclusions-on-gregory-clarks-farewell.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	The last four chapters of Gregory Clark’s ‘A Farewell to Alms’ are now under debate at Marginal Revolution (<a href="http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/">here</a>). <br /><br />The four chapters are not as comprehensive a conclusion as I was looking for; perhaps reading it in sections over three weeks (so much else intrudes!) is not <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/conclusions-on-gregory-clarks-farewell.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Mandeville Is Not a Safe Guide to Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/mandeville-is-not-safe-guide-to-adam.html</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:10:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/mandeville-is-not-safe-guide-to-adam.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	“Culture: A Euro of Excuses' in 'Bits of News' (USA), 12 September 2007, by Henry Midgley<br /><br />"Bernard Mandeville in the Fable of the Bees took on this impression. Mandeville argued that private vice makes public virtue. He suggested that it was our immoral appetites, our selfish desires that came <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/mandeville-is-not-safe-guide-to-adam.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: September's Lost Legacy Prize for Hannah Miller</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/septembers-lost-legacy-prize-for-hannah.html</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:11:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/septembers-lost-legacy-prize-for-hannah.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	From Philly.com (‘the region’s home page’), Philadelphia Daily News - Philadelphia, PA, USA is a letter ‘In defense of Hannah Miller’ by Ben Burrows:<br /><br />“RE THE RECENT criticism of op-ed writer Hannah Miller":<br /> <br />Hannah Miller volunteers her time to make democracy work. She is no socialist. She <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/septembers-lost-legacy-prize-for-hannah.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Adam Smith's Views of Exchange Value</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/adam-smiths-views-of-exchange-value.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/adam-smiths-views-of-exchange-value.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	‘Ktibuk’, a correspondent asks (9 September) on Mises.org Bloghere: http://blog.mises.org/archives/007085.asp#comments<br /><br />Gavin,<br />What does "capital" have to do with theory of value?<br /><br />My answer:<br /><br />When discussing Adam Smith on his theories of value I address what he wrote and not value theory since the mid-18th century. Smith wrote <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/adam-smiths-views-of-exchange-value.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: A Week-End Debate on Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/week-end-debate-on-adam-smith.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:04:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/week-end-debate-on-adam-smith.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Juan Fernando Carpio writes (8 September) on Mises.org Blog:<br /><br />"In chapter three [WN II.iii.1: page 330] one can find another quote that supports my interpretation of Smith's: "Thus the labour of a manufacturer adds, generally, to the value of the materials which he works upon, that of his own <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/week-end-debate-on-adam-smith.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Rich Landlords Could Do No Other</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/rich-landlords-could-do-no-other.html</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:47:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/rich-landlords-could-do-no-other.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	‘Steve J’ posts this on Radamisto <a href="http://radamisto.blogspot.com/ ">here</a> (9 September):<br /> <br />"THE UNKNOWN ADAM SMITH<br />It's obviously unrealistic, but Smith did believe in a more equitable distribution of wealth and thought it would occur naturally.<br /><br />From his The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. by Knud Haakonssen, pp. <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/rich-landlords-could-do-no-other.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Only in California?   Tagging Employees Like Cattle?</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/only-in-california-tagging-employees.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 03:53:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/only-in-california-tagging-employees.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	A weird story. Can it be true?<br /><br />“Posted by ScuttleMonkey on 3rd September<br />from the not-quite-cattle-yet dept.: <br /><br />InternetVoting writes "California has passed a bill banning companies from requiring employees to have RFID chips surgically implanted. Already one company has been licensed by the federal government, implanting more <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/only-in-california-tagging-employees.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: A Flattering, But Wrong, Attribution of an Author's Words</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/flattering-but-wrong-attribution-of.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 02:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/flattering-but-wrong-attribution-of.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	To have your words attributed to someone else is a burden most authors dread.<br /><br />‘Bad Samaritans’ by Alan Moore (a co-author with Tomin T. Ahonen of<br />“Communities Dominate Brands” quotes a piece on his blog (<a href="http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/">here</a>)<br /><br />“America's greatest treasury secretary, Alexander Hamilton, met an untimely death in <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/flattering-but-wrong-attribution-of.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Silly Saturday Stories on Adam Smith: no. 4</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/silly-saturday-stories-on-adam-smith-no.html</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 04:06:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/silly-saturday-stories-on-adam-smith-no.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	“Saving the environment requires re-writing Economics itself” by Susan Chan, writing in The Canadian (‘Canada’s new socially progressive and cross-cultural national newspaper’ (8 August, Toronto):<br /><br />‘Western industrial civilization has basically bought into the models of "economic prosperity", which have been taught in economics classrooms. The prevailing models of economics <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/silly-saturday-stories-on-adam-smith-no.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Repeated Denials and Doctoring Quotations Damage the Offenders and not Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/repeated-denials-and-doctoring.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:36:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/repeated-denials-and-doctoring.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Juan Fernando Carpo comes back! He does not know when he is sawing the branch he is sitting on. He writes on Mises Blog:<br /><br />"altogether different, are regulated by quite different principles, and bear no proportion to the quantity, the hardship, or the ingenuity of this supposed labour of <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/repeated-denials-and-doctoring.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Book Your Final Seminar Debate Next Wednesday on Gregory Clark's 'Farewell to Alms'</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/book-your-final-seminar-debate-next.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/book-your-final-seminar-debate-next.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	News from Marginal Revolution (<a href="http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/ ">here</a>) <br />will host the last debate on Gregory Clark’s ‘A Farewell to Alms’ (Princeton University Press) on Wednesday next, 13 August. Tyler states: ‘I've been very happy with the experiment and we'll do another one; it is important to do just the right <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/book-your-final-seminar-debate-next.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Claims of Adam Smith's 'Monumental Error' Shown to be False</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/claims-of-adam-smiths-monumental-error.html</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:20:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/claims-of-adam-smiths-monumental-error.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	A debate about Adam Smith’s ‘grave error’ on Mises.org Blog (<a href="http://blog.mises.org/archives/007085.asp#more">here</a>.<br /><br />First the statement of the ‘monumental’ and ‘grave error:<br /><br />‘Adam Smith and Karl Marx's basic and monumental (in consequences) error'<br /><br />Juan Fernando Carpio writes:<br /><br />“What could these two thinkers, considered to be opposites, have <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/claims-of-adam-smiths-monumental-error.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Gregory Clark responds to Comments on His new book</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/gregory-clark-responds-to-comments-on.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:56:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/gregory-clark-responds-to-comments-on.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Over at Marginal Revolution, the debate over Gregory Clark’s ‘A Farewell to Alms’ (Princeton University Press) continues <a href="http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2007/09/a-farewell-to-a.html#more">here</a>.<br /><br />Gregory Clark responds to my earlier efforts:<br /><br />“I do not want to debate Gavin Kennedy on intellectual history (that would be like me challenging Roger Federer to a tennis <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/gregory-clark-responds-to-comments-on.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Long Post on Important Subject for All Interested in the History of Economics</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/long-post-on-important-subject-for-all.html</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 04:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/long-post-on-important-subject-for-all.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	To All Readers:<br /><br />Please read the correspondence below and, if you agree with the comments from Sandra Peart, President of the History of Economics Society (and its most distinguished list of co-signatories among economists), send supporting email/letter with your comments to Dr. Brett (address included in the correspondence). <br <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/long-post-on-important-subject-for-all.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
		<title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Latest From the Debate on 'Farewell to Alms' by Gregory Clark at Marginal Revolution</title>
		<link>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/latest-from-debate-on-farewell-to-alms.html</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 05:15:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/latest-from-debate-on-farewell-to-alms.html</guid>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	Over at Marginal Revolution, Gregory Clark's Farewell to Alms contionues to be debated.<br /><br />Gregory Clark coments on my contributions:<br /> <br />'Smith is all about Smithian Growth in the millenia leading to 1776 - the expansion of the economy by reducing the impediments to trade, and thus extending the <a href="http://blognetbiz.com/econ/go.php?http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2007/09/latest-from-debate-on-farewell-to-alms.html" target="_blank">[...]</a> ]]></content:encoded>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
